Martin Lewis
MoneySavingExpert.com Masthead Logo
Bookmark
Digg
Facebook
Twitter

Archive for the ‘Media’ Category

My minute-by-minute (political) day in the life…

It’s been a while since I blogged one of my days (see the ‘It’s a typical day’ blog)…

Yesterday was a tough one, as I was hardcore tired after Tuesday (which is always a long day as I get picked up at 6:40ish in the morning to do GMTV, then focus on the weekly email for the rest of the day. I rarely finish before 10pm).

Normally I get to recover on Wednesday mornings, but yesterday was different:

  • 6.25 am. Alarm.
  • 6.55 am. Taxi motorbike to get to GMTV.
  • 7.15 am. Arrive, go to the green room & meet the producer looking after my slot.
  • 7.35 am. On air to do a four minute slot on redundancy planning, based on new unemployment figures.
  • 7.40 am. Leave studio, have a chat with Wendi Peters in the corridor & lift (ex Coronation street actor, now in new play)
  • 7.45 am. Go to the 2nd floor cafeteria, get my laptop out and start checking through emails. We’ve just gone live with the Lib Dems pledge parliamentary motion on automatic bank charges payout story, so my priority is to see the impact.
  • 8.00 am. The cafeteria opens, and I’m about to get breakfast when the producer comes down. We then run through the email questions sent in so far to try and balance the range of questions.
  • 8.20 am. Walk back up to the studio.
  • 8.35 am. On air again for a five-minute slot on redundancy, this time answering viewers’ questions.
  • 8.45 am. Meet with the planning editor, Owen, about next week’s slots.
  • 9.05 am. Leave GMTV and walk to Trafalgar Square.
  • 9.25 am. Arrive in Trafalgar Square; finally get some breakfast in a place with free wi-fi.
  • 9.30 am. Open up the laptop to go through every link from the weekly email and see how it’s working. Call MSE Dan in the office and we discuss if we need to make any tweaks in the email for the second batch to be sent.
  • (more…)

Record 878,000 web visits in one day – a billion hits a month

Last Wed (27 July) was the biggest single day the site’s ever had; a monster 878,000 people came to the site (inc. Main site, forum, tools etc) beating the previous record of 854,000 set in January.

While it mightn’t seem it, overtaking a January record is important; the site’s constantly growing, but like all money sites seasonal trends affect it, and the start of the year is always disproportionately enormous, as everyone’s sorting their cash out. Therefore to have beaten Jan in July is great.

It was also helped by the fact last week’s email was jam-packed with big subjects and savings – one of the strongest we’ve ever launched – and we got the email away without any major blocks from Internet providers (the email goes to so many people sometimes even big email clients can’t cope with the volume and just block it as a defence).

A bit more info for stat nerds.

Now as I’ve noted here before, you have to be careful when quoting web stats, as people use incorrect terms.

To give you an idea here’s the exact stats for last wed (sourced from our internal Google Analytics numbers):

  • Unique users: 710,900 different people visited the site in a day.
  • Visits: Those people made 878,000 separate visits between them (ie some came more than once)
  • Pages: They looked at 3,241,000 different pages on the site between them.

Now it’s also important to note that these stats are the DAILY numbers, whereas web stats are usually quoted and compared monthly, and again July was huge.

  • Unique users: 7,920,000 different people visited the site in a month.
  • Visits: They made 15,335,000 separate visits.
  • Pages: They looked at 68,156,000 different pages.

You’ll note there’s no “hits” figure in there. That’s because frankly it’s meaningless, it’s just about how many objects e.g. images are on a page, so a site could have lots of hits without many users just because it has lots of objects. That’s why many small sites use the term. It sounds impressive, but means nothing.

For that reason we don’t track it, but i suspect MoneySavingExpert.com now has over a billion hits a month…

Comment and Discuss

Over-egging the stripes on GMTV

Slightly annoyed with myself. As my slot ended today, Emma complimented me on air about my shirt (a bright purple one – stripy of course)

So I told the tale of how I’d bought them: there were three similar ones of different colours, and I’d got 25% off after asking for a discount. It’s all about haggling.

The moment the cameras were off I realised while I had bought three and haggled, they were different shirts. With this three, they’d just rounded the price down a few quid…

Lets hope the shirtmakers weren’t watching!

Comment and Discuss.

PS. If you wonder why so many shirts, that’s the nature of telly (and running a forum where people comment on them all the time – gotta keep it fresh!)

Big Brother’s flawed wealth test –a missed lesson

In last night’s Big Brother, two of the housemates, Kenny and Siavash, were put through a “wealth” test. It involved correctly naming the prices of various objects from a pint of milk to a top end Ferrari.

Yet for me the entire premise was fundamentally flawed (I know it’s Big Brother so I’m not taking it too seriously), much like the 1980s and 90s television programme “The Price is Right”.

To prove my point let me ask you a question..

“How much does a pint of milk cost?”

HIGHLIGHT THE SECTION BELOW AFTER YOU’VE ANSWERED IN YOUR HEAD…

If you answered numerically somewhere between 40p and 80p you’re in the right ballpark – but still in my view totally wrong.

The only real way to answer this is with another set of questions “where is this pint of milk bought from, and is it a particular brand?”

We do not live in a world where a pint of milk is homogenous: there are different brands of milk and even they are sold at different prices in different stores. A pint in a huge Tesco is likely to be substantially cheaper than at a train station convenience store.

In many ways ignoring that ignores the entire premise of this site and the values of many of its users. We live in a world of commodities, where the same or very similar goods are sold in many places dressed up in many different ways for vastly differing prices – the aim of MoneySaving is to buy the same thing but pay less for it.

It’s a shame, especially considering the audience that Big Brother reaches, that this was missed (though I’m not saying that’s their remit): a real test of wealth would have been able to spot the difference in prices and which is the best bargain, not just knowing the absolute price of things.

Now admittedly when I started watching the quiz, my assumption was that it had been missed due to what TV regulatory rules call “undue prominence”. That means unless there is a justifiable reason you shouldn’t focus on any one store or product.

Yet I was later surprised when one of the questions asked what the cost of a loaf of Warburton’s bread was. My suspicion here the programme’s lawyers felt it was justified to name a particular brand of bread, because otherwise the variance in price would have been too great, therefore this was necessary and thus due prominence (though where you buy it counts here too).

Yet in my view the difference in cost of a pint of milk at various stores would have made it equally as justifiable to specify that in the question too.

Could it be the reason this was missed is the message “it’s not just what you buy, it’s where you buy it” still hasn’t spread widely enough?

Comment and discuss

PS. I think Siavash is going to win this year!

I almost went to France

Some days are strange….

    • Left home went to London’s Charing Cross Station
    • Got the train to Dover
    • Ferry’d to Calais
    • Stayed on the ferry at Calais
    • Ferry’d to Dover
    • Am currently on the train back to Charing Cross

All this to do a 90-second film for GMTV on mobile roaming, about what counts as being abroad.

France… Je ne le pense pas

Comment and Discuss.

Steal Pepsi Max: promoting theft of their own product.

I saw the new Pepsi Max TV ad last night , and was slightly bemused. The ‘Pepsi Max guys’ are at a cricket match. In a chiller box the steward has a raft of Pepsi Max cans. A streaker runs on the pitch, the steward chases her, and when he returns the Pepsi Max has gone. Yet our ‘heroes’ are drinking cans of it, and then the punchline… one of their number returns to his seat taking off his girl disguise suit.

Now while it’s meant to be funny, it’s effectively showing the brand heroes stealing the drink. The message is meant to be Pepsi Max is cool and naughty, but it also seems to indicate that nicking it is fine too and just a laugh. What a rather silly premise; I suspect supermarkets and vendors wouldn’t take the same view if people decided to follow Pepsi’s ‘help yourself’ motif from their stores – never mind the company itself.

Am I just having a sense of humour failure…

Comment and Discuss.

Apparently my Stiffies was cut!

I’ve been appearing in dictionary corner on Countdown this week. The shows were actually recorded back in March. As you can see from my blog at the time, Doing Countdown and getting a rude word to boot, I had a fun time.

It was yesterday’s (Wed) episode that was supposed to contain the rude word, and while I haven’t seen it myself I’ve been told it wasn’t broadcast.

So I can now reveal (if you didn’t guess from the blog title) the word was “stiffies”. Now there’s no doubt it’s a word, and is in the dictionary; the problem is there’s only one definition, which isn’t that easy for mid-afternoon telly. Luckily for Countdown, as it was from dictionary corner not the contestants, it’s possible to edit it out without impacting the result of the game.

As it wasn’t broadcast I can tell you the full story now. Once we realised what the word was, as the clock was ticking down, I wrestled with whether to say it or not and tried to come up with a way round it saying something like (from memory from two months ago so give or take):

“Well we do indeed have an eight letter word here. Now it’s an interesting one for this time in the afternoon, and so to make it easier I thought I would explain how to think about it.

When you walk past a shop they often have mannequins in the window. Some of these are flexible and can be positioned any way you want, while others are rigid and unmoving. So if you had a collection of these you could call them “stiffies”.

Comment and Discuss.

Fawlty Towers: Uncle Terry wants a Gin & Tonic

Quite a strange experience tonight. Watching Fawlty towers and up pops the MSFs Uncle Terry (Terence Conoley). I always knew he’d been in it but until tonight had never seen him.

He’s actually in two episodes. The first was the very first Fawlty Towers “A Touch Of Class” where he constantly demands with ever increasing fury a “Gin & Orange, a lemon squash and a scotch and water”.

What was rather surreal is the fact that having seen it before I knew exactly who the character was, but until watching it now it’d never clicked that’s who Terry was. After seeing it I realised how many other things I’d seen him in. Terry is now nearly 90, and full of wonderful stories, with a fantastic cut glass accent and manner (he’s an ex-opera singer too).

Having seen the first it was a quick fast forward to the the next one he was in – the “Waldorf Salad” episode. Again he’s playing an irate “Mr. Johnson”, this time in a wig, which apparently he went shopping with John Cleese for, to ensure he wasn’t recognised as the same actor from the first series.

Go “Uncle” Terry!

Comment and Discuss.

How credit ratings work: coming full circle.

I’m just finishing work on an ITV1 Tonight for Friday 8 May on credit ratings on how they work and how to boost them. As always when filming a detailed programme like this I learn new useful titbits which I can add to the guide (see credit ratings).

Each time though, it tends to be something even more niche and technical, this time it was that you can delink your credit score if you’ve a still open but not active joint account, plus for the first time looked into fraud scoring with National Hunter (the guide should be updated with that by tomorrow).

What was funny about this though is my first EVER TV package was on credit ratings and how they work. It was back in January 2000, I’d just left the BBC and was starting at Simply Money TV as a reporter. The channel hadn’t launched yet and we were doing films for pre-launch; so I did a six-minute film on how credit ratings work.

It was back then I remember coining the phraseology I still use now: “Credit ratings don’t exist. Credit Blacklists don’t exist. Each lender has its own unique scoring system to work out if you’re a profitable customer.” Thankfully no editions exist on You Tube; it was a long time ago and I was a rather shy first time 27 year old new reporter (I’d been a producer previously).

I’ve since written and done a lot on credit ratings, and each time the knowledge base grows. This particular programme was fun to do as we had a panel with James, who runs education for Experian, and mortgage broker Ray Boulger of John Charcol. I think by the end of it we’d all learned little titbits off each other and hopefully the programme’s better for it.

Comment and Discuss.

Ugh! Terrible slip. BT free line installation not line rental. Choking isn’t good!

On my GMTV Lorraine slot this morning, I was talking about BT’s free line installation deal (see free BT installation note). It’s a rare chance to avoid the usual £122.50 cost.

I’ve just had one of those calls … the producer rang to say “can I just check, at the end of the piece, you said free line rental. That was just a slip wasn’t it?” It seems BT has had calls requesting free line rental and has called GMTV.

From what I recall, I choked just before as I was speaking (you’ll remember if you saw it) and had to stop, it threw me a bit. The whole piece was about line installation, but it shows that even one word misplaced towards the end can be a problem. I suppose if I thought there was a small chance of free line rental I would’ve called too.

Though it’s very frustrating – especially as I wasn’t aware I’d done it until I got the call.

So sorry BT & anyone who saw it … sometimes the wrong word comes out.

Comment and Discuss

The recession’s over … it’s recovery time!

Great news isn’t it? Listening to yesterday’s budget, the political buzz-phrase that kept ringing out was “as we proceed to recovery”. Isn’t language marvellous? We went from boom-time, to downturn, then recession lasted a week, and now we’re “heading to recovery”.

Call me old fashioned, but when the economy is due to shrink 3.5% this year, according to Alasdair Darling (4.1% according to the IMF), that’s still in the serious mire of recession.

I suppose by the same logic, we should start referring to premiership footballers as “heading for the commentary box”, or newborn babies as “heading for retirement”.

Comment and Discuss

I almost missed my award.

I’ve just come back from the London Press Club lunch, where I was delighted to pick up the “Consumer Journalist of the Year” award.

Not coming from a print journalism background I wasn’t aware of quite how big a do this was and when I got there realised most of the National papers editors and many high profile top hacks were there. On my table alone were the Editor and Dep Ed of the Times plus Robert Peston (who deservedly won Biz Journalist of the year).

Not my finest hour.

Now of course I’m very chuffed to have got such a prestigious trophy, but that aside, it honestly wasn’t the best day.

When I first heard it was on a Tuesday, I said I couldn’t go. Firstly, it’s my GMTV morning, then working on the weekly email for the rest of the day until late in the evening. There’s never a moments break. I was, however, persuaded that it would be “stoopid” not to attend.

Yet when I woke up this morning for my 6.40 transport to GMTV, I felt very sick, and I’ve been seriously nauseous all day. So much so that when I left filming at GMTV at 12:30 to go to the awards, I deliberately didn’t take my make-up off; I’m so green otherwise I think it’d scare people.

Toilet Break at a bad time.

Lunch was nice, I sat next to a lovely lady from British Gas who runs British Gas’s regional PR department (they were the award sponsors) in Cardiff and is a site user; she thankfully kept my mind off my green gills.

Then the awards were about to start so we checked the order. As it seemed mine was the third one, I nipped out to the loo. Sauntering back I saw my name on the screen, realised it’d been the first award, and heard them announcing that I’d won. I ran in, in a bit a fuddle, walked up said thank you.

Then I ending up sitting back down in the wrong chair (one belonging to Sir Christopher Meyer who was presenting the awards) and embarrassingly then had to get up again and walk back to the right one.

No chance to thank the News of the World.

Worse still, these things are quite political and I had wanted to thank the News of the World, for being different and giving a money columnist a place up the front of the newspaper (most money columnists are kept in the money ghetto). In these times they do try and grasp the fact that practical news is a real help to people.

Yet when I said “do I say something” as I got the award they said no. Then I found out that while I was out they’d said “please keep speeches short or do none at all”, and virtually everyone else thanked the organisations they worked for. So I hope they don’t feel snubbed! Let me say thank you here… thank you.

Comment and Discuss

Sir Alan you’re 110% right!

Three cheers for Sir Alan, nope this isn’t about Premium Bonds, as you’ll know from the premium bonds: are they worth it? guide we’re not singing from the same song sheet on that one.

Yet when I finally got round to watching The Apprentice from two weeks ago, he did something which made my heart sing.

One of the contestants told him they’d give 110% effort, and he snapped back something akin to “just 100% will do, don’t start with that.”

Now this proves that Sir Alan is a proper numbers man, and I’m very glad to see I’m not the only one who gets frustrated with this trite & incorrect phrase.

As I wrote in my first blog declaring war on 110% effort, you can’t give more than 100%, the point is quite simple.

“You cannot give more than 100% effort. Giving 101% means you are making an effort beyond your actual capacity. Even if you are making more effort than was previously possible for you, then in fact your ‘effort output’ has increased, but you’re still giving 100% (though an effort level you may previously have described as 80% is now recalibrated as a 79% effort!).”

Comment and Discuss

PS. Also see related old blogs: further war on 110% effort, Go JLS – 100% right.

It’s Official! Stripy Shirts Are Fashionable

Friends, enemies, site users, viewers, profile writers, colleagues, relatives, broadcasters and somewhere I’m sure even farm yard animals have taken the mickey out of my stripy shirts. Yet I’ve weathered the storm, and remained as faithful to them as stamp adhesive.

True, I do now throw in a few plain-styled tapered shirts just for variety, but my wardrobe of more than 50 striped varieties remains relatively unblemished (well, once they’re out of the wash).

Now you may be thinking that fashion and Martin Lewis go together like pigeons and decaf coffee, yet not any more – according to the Independent I’ve made it to the top 100 most influential people in the world of fashion (online… but hey).

So without further ado, with the power vested in me as the 25th most influential person of trend (online). I’d like to pronounce the stripey shirt as the number one fashion statement of the next five years. Zebras, Tigers and ladies who publically undress (stripers…) our time has come!

Comment and Discuss.

Doing Countdown… and getting a rude word to boot!

I’m on the train back from Leeds, where I’ve spent the day in Countdown’s dictionary corner. I watched the programme as a child, so it’s a real joy to be a part of it, and something I had been unable to do in previous years. And of course as a Scrabble player it’s right up my street.

There are five episodes filmed in a day, so while I’ll be on for the whole week (starting 4 May), it’s actually quite a hardcore schedule to do them all; yet as the newish on-air team of Jeff, Rachel and Suzie seem to work really well together – it’s all pretty seemless.

What you do in dictionary corner.

There are two main jobs for the dictionary corner person to do. The first is to talk at the end of the rounds, and come up with words alongside Suzie (the master of the dictionaries). Yet as the guest you don’t do that alone; I think (hope) it’s not super-secret that the dictionary corner person has one of the producers – a former countdown grand champion – helping via an earpiece.

The speed at which he came up with long words was phenomenal. Sometimes I was just starting to look at the letter when he says “sevens, midgets, fidgets”. Though I was pleased that especially towards the latter programmes, I got into the zone and started to get a few of the same ones without the help (and if you see me say corneas, look for an extra twinkle in my eye – that was the one time I got one they didn’t spot).

The other part of the job is doing a two-minute anecdote at the end of part one. Yet I asked, and they allowed me, to do something a wee bit different. I took questions from the MoneySaving IQ test to ask Jeff (the presenter), Suzie and Rachel (numbers whizz). I think (hope, again!) it worked.

Most revealing was asking Rachel to work out how long takes to clear £5,000 on a credit card, paying only the minimum repayments; it’s a nightmare calculation and even she struggled within the time period. It goes to show how outrageous the minimum payment system is if someone as bright as her can’t do it (see the minimum repayments guide to see just how horrid it really is).

For me the day was a welcome break. At the moment, my job’s occasionally quite stressful and a bit depressing; MoneySaving in the recession often means talking about some distressing stories, and the need be straight-faced and earnest means you can get entrenched in such a mood. Today it was smiles and fun, bad puns and quips (i was groaning inside at myself sometimes).

Rude word.

The golden moment, and one I’ll never forget, was getting an eight-letter rude word, which has no other definition other than the rude one, and is completely unsuitable for the mid-afternoon slot. Yet it was the longest word (and there’s a clue in that…) possible, so it had to be done. As I started to define it, I didn’t know where I was going, but then I had an inspired thought; instead of giving the correct definition, I’d make one up, one that hopefully kids wouldn’t bat an eye at, but would make adults smile knowingly. I can’t tell you what it is – but it’s the Wed (6 May) programme that it’s on.

Comment and discuss

Double Downshift through the eyes of a 12 year old.

On ITV1 Tonight this evening (8pm) we’re doing a secret double downshift. Literally dropping two supermarket brand levels on a family’s shopping without the Dad and one brother knowing (see supermarket shopping for more on the downshift challenge).

While it’s secret, there were no hidden cameras, just a special weapon. The elder brother in the family, twelve year-old Charlie, wants to be a film director and is part of his school’s film club. So, armed with a High Def hard drive mini camera, he was filming the family’s dinners for a “school project”. Little did they know it wasn’t their normal food, and it wasn’t for school.

His mum Eliane has just sent me Charlie’s own film cut of the week, so as a preview to the show I thought you’d like to see it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RsWxoWL5pM

Comment and Discuss.

Finally, an Olympic Gold!

OK it was only for three seconds, but this morning I held an Olympic gold medal in my hands, and not just any old gold, but an athletics gold for a blistering run by Christine Ohuruogu in the womens 400m at last year’s games.

I’ve written before about my obsession with athletics (see Star Struck at the British Athletics awards blog), so this was quite a moment. It happened in the green room at GMTV this morning. Christine was on just before me, and I was a little too shy to say hello beforehand. When I came back from doing my slot she was still there with her agent, and the medal – which’d been shown on the programme – was on the sofa next to me, so I couldn’t resist asking if I could take a peek.

It has its own presentation case and a box inside. The medal itself has a gold centre, and then a ceramic disk, and another gold centre. I’ve grabbed a pic off the web of the type below…

As a little boy I dreamed of being in the Olympics, and by the age of 10 I realised I had more chance of writing about them than taking part, but it didn’t stop my fascination. So today, holding the medal in my hand was just wonderful. Thank you Christine.

Comment and Discuss

Olympic medals

Is this site a Coronation Street Star?

Thanks to eagle-eyed and eared forumite ‘Nile’ for this. Apparently, Coronation Street’s Kirk is a MoneySaver. According to Nile (who kindly watched the repeat so it could be transcribed) this was in the dialogue, and it’s referring to MoneySavingExpert.com

Rovers Return scene

    Kirk: It’s great this website. All these tips about how to save money. I was thinking about what you were saying before and seeing as how I’m out of work, I’m gonna try and lower our outgoings.

    I’m kicking off by making my own Christmas cards.

    Julie: It’s February!

    Kirk: Well planning ahead is one of the keys, this website says.

On the street, leaving the shop scene

    Kirk: Bicarb: gets dog smells out the carpet a treat and cleans your bog.

Now that does sound almost definitely like the Old Style section of the site, and the charity book Thrifty Ways.

I must say it doesn’t surprise me, in the times I’ve been to an Audience with… I’ve met quite a few of the Corrie cast who do use this site. One (who will remain nameless) even came up to me to say thanks for a big Bank charges reclaim (see this TV stars reclaim blog.)

So fingers crossed after this episode we’ve got fictional users joining the factual.

Comment and Discuss.

Just been to see the Queen.

I’ve just arrived back at MSE Towers from the Buckingham Palace relaunch of www.royal.gov.uk. While not much of a Royalist generally, I couldn’t resist the chance to glimpse inside and see what it was all about. Though it did involve having to put a suit on, not something I do often, or with relish.

It’s a little scary to go there.

On arrival, I felt a little apprehensive; there’s something quite imposing about walking through the large palace gates, into normally forbidden territory, alone. Yet the policeman checking my ID instantly said “don’t worry, I know who you are anyway” which helped. Then I walked through the car park, and instantly regretted not driving; the chance to park in the red tarmacked quadrangle is something I shouldn’t have missed.

Once checked in, having hung my coat up in the cloakroom and got my badge, it was time to walk up the red carpeted staircase (replete with gold embossed banisters). On the way up the footman gave me a smile, told me he loves the site and had saved a fortune off Bank charges and the credit card shuffle. So while I suspect the Queen isn’t a MoneySaver herself, it’s good to know someone in the Royal household is.

Trying to find someone I knew in the reception.

Once into the pre-reception room, I looked around for any face I recognised. The only one I saw was Spencer Kelly from BBC Click. While I’ve never met him, he’s a friend of a friend, so I decided that was the safest route and went to say hello.

He was talking to a couple of other people, including the founder of parkatmyhouse (linked to in the boost your income guide, and apparently gets a good deal of traffic through from it) and Ian, who is head of digital online for Number 10 (and the man who twitters for it).

Then there was a sudden hush, a little movement, grand doors opened, and we were ushered into the next room and asked to hand invites over. It was only at this point I noticed the slightly short, white haired, immaculate dressed lady in a green conservative outfit and realised it was HM the Queen. We were all ushered through the line with a quick handshake, then into the next, rather opulent and grand reception room, which had a big screen on the far side.

Offically opened with a remote control.

Soon after, Tim Berners Lee – the founder of the web – made a speech about the new site, which includes hi-res 360 degree views of various royal buildings. Then in a most surreal moment, the Queen was handed a remote control to “officially open” the new site, whereupon she, like the rest of us, looked rather bemused, and a little bubble of laughter pumped up.

After that, quails’ eggs, pastries, and sausages were offered round and the 100 or so people there congregated in groups. I stayed in my original four and we were joined by Rory Cellan-Jones, the BBC’s technology correspondent, when we were again introduced to the Queen, this time for a conversation.

Do you use the web, maam?

It’s rather strange working out what you actually have to say. I felt we were collectively tag-teaming to keep a dialogue going, even though our group included three professional broadcasters. I couldn’t resist asking “I hope this isn’t cheeky, but do you ever use the internet?” The answer was, “Not personally no, but the entire palace seems to run on it these days”.

The dialogue then moved on to how young people use the web as a matter of course, and discussing whether two year-olds using a mouse was a bit like under-10s absorbing languages with ease.

After that and a few more brief chats with various people it was time to get my coat and go. As I was walking out of the palace gates, a policeman came up to me and said “I think you should know you’ve got the price sticker on the sole of your shoe and you can see it as you walk.” I was wearing new-ish shoes to go with the suit, then with a knowing nod he added, “so is it a mistake or just to prove you bought them in the sales?”

Comment and Discuss

Wayne Rooney you’re my hero

Ok, a little bit of an exaggeration, but when reading this story in the News of the World about how Wayne & Colleen had been to a restaurant and paid with a voucher I thought “HOORAH”.

Over the last year or so it’s wonderful to see the stigma of using voucher has faded into nothingness. The daily updated Restaurant Vouchers page on this site is often read over 100,000 times a day. It’s become de rigeur – even footballers wives are happy with it! So well done the Rooneys for showing it ain’t about the cash you’ve got, it’s getting good value thats counts.

Comment and Discuss

This website is based on journalistic research. It does not constitute financial advice. Any information should be considered in regard to specific circumstances. All tips are followed at your own risk and should be followed up with your own research . See Full Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. ® Martin Lewis and MoneySavingExpert.com. 'Martin Lewis' and 'Money Saving Expert' are registered trademarks belonging to Martin Lewis.
[Sitemap | Q & As | Contacts | About the Site | Accessibility | Site's Funding]