Martin Lewis
MoneySavingExpert.com Masthead Logo
Bookmark
Digg
Facebook
Twitter

Archive for July, 2009

Over-egging the stripes on GMTV

Slightly annoyed with myself. As my slot ended today, Emma complimented me on air about my shirt (a bright purple one – stripy of course)

So I told the tale of how I’d bought them: there were three similar ones of different colours, and I’d got 25% off after asking for a discount. It’s all about haggling.

The moment the cameras were off I realised while I had bought three and haggled, they were different shirts. With this three, they’d just rounded the price down a few quid…

Lets hope the shirtmakers weren’t watching!

Comment and Discuss.

PS. If you wonder why so many shirts, that’s the nature of telly (and running a forum where people comment on them all the time – gotta keep it fresh!)

…because they can

If I had a penny for every time that thought had popped into my head in response to a question I’ve been sent, I reckon I could easily have £17.28.

Whilst not much money, it’s a lot of people. Whether it’s emails to the site, suggestions for Question of the week in the email, or emails for my News of the World column, whatever the subject the answer’s the same…

Here’s some recent examples…

  • How can a credit card provider increase the credit card APR from 16.9% to 34%?
  • How can credit reference companies justify charging £70 a year for files that only cost £2?
  • How can Ryanair charge £10 per person each way just for paying by debit card?
  • How can Tesco justify giving me less compensation because I spotted their mistake before leaving the store, rather than having to come back?
  • How can companies deny me a mortgage just because I’ve become self employed?

These are the tip of the proverbial iceberg. The problem stems from the fact most people assume that companies need to behave fairly, or that we’ve a right to access their services. This is especially true with questions starting “How can they justify…”. Inevitably the answer is, because they don’t justify it; you can either choose to access that service/buy that good or not.

Neither are true, companies need behave within the law (barring financial services where treating customers fairly counts too – see the financial ombudsman guide) yet laws don’t stretch far.

Let’s re-examine those example questions above, this time with an expanded answer – purely from a technical basis not considering fairness.

  • How can a credit card provider increase the credit card APR from 16.9% to 34%?
    …because it can. Your credit agreement says it can, and there’s no regulation limiting APRs. In the terms it says your rate is variable, as an aside t also almost certainly says it could demand you repay in full too. Now you could and probably should question the ‘fairness’ of this one with the Financial Ombudsman- and there is a chance – but in general “because it can” still stands.

  • How can credit reference companies justify charging £70 a year for files that only cost £2?
    …because they can. They can charge what they like for their services; it’s our choice whether to buy them. The law only says that they must offer access to credit reference files by POST for £2. They have no need to justify their charges, their need is to sell their services and persuade you it’s worth paying (see the credit scoring guide for how to beat them).
  • How can Ryanair charge £10 per person each way just for paying by debit card?
    …because it can. There are no rules stopping airlines adding extra charges for paying by debit card. It’s arguable though that to describe these as ‘extra’ due to the fact Electron cards are free is wrong, and I hope we’ll see pressure brought to bear to change this soon (see the Beat Budget Airline charges note for how to beat these).
  • How can Tesco justify giving me less compensation because I spotted their mistake before leaving the store, rather than having to come back?
    …because it can. That’s a Tesco internal policy, which is far more generous than the law sets out, so as long as it follows clear guidelines, it can do what it wants.
  • How can companies deny me a mortgage just because I’ve become self employed?
    …because they can. You have no right to borrow money, whether a mortgage, loan or credit card. Lenders are private companies trying to make profit and if they don’t want to take the risk lending you cash they needn’t. Sadly they perceive self-employed people as less certain so a higher risk. This isn’t an issue for an individual company, it’s one to take up with politicians and regulators if we want borrowing to be available we need lobby them to put controls in place (or make the banks they now own actually work).

Overall the answer is there are times to exercise our rights, but when we have no rights it’s time to exercise our choice and not use the company’s services any more. The worry is when there’s no choice and it’s a systemic, industry-wide issue. Then it’s time to campaign (part of what MSE’s here for).

Comment and Discuss.

The girl in the £35 dress

It’s now become an almost annual tradition that Mrs MSE and I, rather bizarrely, get invited to the Cartier polo at Windsor – one of the big events of the summer ‘social’ calendar (see past blogs how the other 1% live & Michael Buerk, what’s the manly way to hold a fan?)

This all comes about as my agent Knight Ayton as well as looking after individuals also represents specific brands, and Cartier is one of the premier ones. As always it was packed with the super glam and the super rich (and a few invited media types), with high-end socialites making polished cat-callings of “hello daaarling”, and Anton Mosimann food served in a huge marquee in the midst of a grassy field.

My favourite moment was when three uber-chic designer doyennes – young fashion PR girls – came excitedly to ask “do we have the right credit cards?” They were doing quite well, until one decided to try and persuade me that I should do a “Money Saving” slot on GMTV about how buying her company’s £3,000 handbag was a sensible investment for everybody!

Yet to balance that, in some of the fashion coverage of this designer do, where most were spending £100s or thousands, for me the most beautiful was the one wearing a £35 dress – that’s how you do it.

Comment and Discuss.

Big Brother’s flawed wealth test –a missed lesson

In last night’s Big Brother, two of the housemates, Kenny and Siavash, were put through a “wealth” test. It involved correctly naming the prices of various objects from a pint of milk to a top end Ferrari.

Yet for me the entire premise was fundamentally flawed (I know it’s Big Brother so I’m not taking it too seriously), much like the 1980s and 90s television programme “The Price is Right”.

To prove my point let me ask you a question..

“How much does a pint of milk cost?”

HIGHLIGHT THE SECTION BELOW AFTER YOU’VE ANSWERED IN YOUR HEAD…

If you answered numerically somewhere between 40p and 80p you’re in the right ballpark – but still in my view totally wrong.

The only real way to answer this is with another set of questions “where is this pint of milk bought from, and is it a particular brand?”

We do not live in a world where a pint of milk is homogenous: there are different brands of milk and even they are sold at different prices in different stores. A pint in a huge Tesco is likely to be substantially cheaper than at a train station convenience store.

In many ways ignoring that ignores the entire premise of this site and the values of many of its users. We live in a world of commodities, where the same or very similar goods are sold in many places dressed up in many different ways for vastly differing prices – the aim of MoneySaving is to buy the same thing but pay less for it.

It’s a shame, especially considering the audience that Big Brother reaches, that this was missed (though I’m not saying that’s their remit): a real test of wealth would have been able to spot the difference in prices and which is the best bargain, not just knowing the absolute price of things.

Now admittedly when I started watching the quiz, my assumption was that it had been missed due to what TV regulatory rules call “undue prominence”. That means unless there is a justifiable reason you shouldn’t focus on any one store or product.

Yet I was later surprised when one of the questions asked what the cost of a loaf of Warburton’s bread was. My suspicion here the programme’s lawyers felt it was justified to name a particular brand of bread, because otherwise the variance in price would have been too great, therefore this was necessary and thus due prominence (though where you buy it counts here too).

Yet in my view the difference in cost of a pint of milk at various stores would have made it equally as justifiable to specify that in the question too.

Could it be the reason this was missed is the message “it’s not just what you buy, it’s where you buy it” still hasn’t spread widely enough?

Comment and discuss

PS. I think Siavash is going to win this year!

I hate Stoozers (17)

For those who don’t know, stoozing (18) is the name for making free money from credit cards (see the stoozers guide). You may therefore be surprised at the title of this blog (7), as it’s something I’ve long been associated with: I was the first person to broadcast a system on how to do it way back in 2000.

Yet last night Mrs MSE put “Stoozers” down on a triple word score square in Scrabble, scoring 103 points (she had two blanks!). Normally (13) of course I would try and dispute any slightly non-conventional word that’s not universally in all dictionaries, but it’s quite tough in this case (especially after my An easy way to win at Scrabble blog)

Until then I had been comfortably in the lead, now we’re neck and neck (due to finish it tonight). Bah (8) humbug (14).

Comment (13) and Discuss (10)

PS. I actually wrote this yesterday morning. We finished the game last night, and thankfully I got three 7 letter words so thankfully I recovered and the final score was 500-438 (our highest ever combined total).

Should I give away my ashes hat?

Recently had the sweetest email come through…

“PLEASE Martin can I have your ashes hat.My oldest son is 46 and cricket mad,a welsh england supporter,he would wear it with pride………..” (name withheld)

The hat she’s talking about is this one in the logo at the top of the site:

Ashes hat

Sorry to break the news, it’s only a virtual hat, but I asked my designer what he could do…

Cut out and keep ashes hat

Best we can come up with I’m afraid.

Comment and Discuss

Apparently I’m an environmental scourge…

I’ve had a rather strange, name-calling email from someone due to the site’s Cheap Flights Guide and FlightChecker, which successfully show people how to get the cheapest flights.

While I believe environmental concerns are important, so is protecting the pounds in peoples’ pockets. And the clue to this site’s priorties lies at the top of every page: “Money Saving Expert”. That means our key concern is showing people how to do what they want to do for less.

The ‘Complaint’

While not the first to send such an email is certainly the most vituperative. Before I explain my viewpoint on this I thought you’d like to read the unedited email and make your own mind up. It’s worth noting this was titled “formal complaint”, whatever that means. (more…)

The recession’s end means HIGHER prices.

I was listening to Radio 5 Live in my headphones on the way into GMTV this morning (on the back of a taxi motorbike at 6:40ish – the best way for live telly as it means traffic problems are diminished).

The money presenter Andy Verity was in a Northampton sausage shop to test the nation’s recession temperature. The last thing I heard was the results of asking listeners to send in their thoughts to finish the sentence “I’ll know the recession’s over when…” sadly I didn’t got to hear Andys response.

Two of the listener responses made me sit bolt upright (never good on a motorbike):

  • I’ll know the recession’s over when petrol prices drop back to 90p/litre.
  • I’ll know the recession’s over when my weekly food shop goes back to £100 from the £150 it is now.

The simple laws of supply and demand tell us that lower demand generally means prices drop, higher demand and they rise. The definition of recession is a shrinking economy, meaning LESS demand as people aren’t buying things. Deflation (falling prices) – or at least low inflation (prices not rising so quickly) – is part of this.

So the idea that the recession being over means things will get cheaper is bizarre. It should actually mean MORE money in the economy pushing to buy the same or similar amounts of goods so prices will rise. More accurate could’ve been:

  • I’ll know the recession’s over when petrol prices hit £1.30/litre.
  • I’ll know the recession’s over when my weekly food shop goes up to £175 from the £150 it is now.

Of course for any individual good that’s an oversimplification as other factors such as supply, transport, geopolitics and specific demand come into play, but as a general point expect prices to start rising once we hit the end of recession (whenever that will be – see Is this the summer of love?)

Comment and Discuss

Warning! Don’t believe imposters working for “Martin Lewis” at Spanish airports!

We’re starting to get reports in from both Alicante and Malaga airport, that a few people have cropped up saying they’re working for me, and doing surveys about PPI misselling. This is a lie and a fraud, and with one exception (see below) everyone should walk away from them.

How their scam works…

The following is one e-mail I had from a lady who had been approached by a company calling itself Life Style…

    “A very friendly woman approached me in the restaurant area at Malaga airport at around 12.30 on Monday 6th July. She held a clip board and said to me “have you heard of Martin Lewis, the guy on TV?” I said yes and she said “I am carrying out a survey on his behalf to help people that have been mis-sold insurance, can I take 5 minutes of your time?”

    I said yes and she then continued to distract me with comments about how she liked my T-shirt, my bracelet and what colour was my lipstick. I was obviously still in “holiday mode” and would not usually take part in surveys, but as she said it was for Martin Lewis I guess I put my guard down.

    She showed me a questionnaire sheet that she had on a clip board with the company name “Lifestyle” in blue lettering across the top. I explained that my partner is a financial adviser therefore I understood the subject of mis-sold insurance but that I could probably not give her any information as I have not had any personal experiences myself.

    She then said “That’s OK if I can just take your details a member of our team will give you a call”. I then stupidly gave her my name, address and email address and then signed the sheet to say that I was happy to receive a phone call.

    To date I have not received any phone calls but I have received no end of junk emails which I would assume have been sent due to me providing her with my email address. As I said before, I generally do not give out my details but on this occasion I misread the situation.

    Luckily I think that it has only resulted in my email address being used as a marketing tool, but thinking about it if she had of asked my date of birth she may have been able to use my identity in some way.”

Please DO talk to them.

If you’ve read this and you’re a reasonably confident person who gets approached by this company please do play along.

We’re desperately trying to get any info we can on who they are, exactly what they’re saying, and especially, contact details. So if you’re in the airport and this happens I’d love your help to try and get whatever info you can.

Comment and Discuss

The first new MoneySavingExpert.com website in 6 years

This week was a momentous one for the site, due to a subtle change. It marks a new stage in its development and it all revolves around the Travel Money Maximiser.

While it’s been on the site for eighteen months, we’ve just supercharged it with more providers and facilities, like a buy back comparison. Yet more revolutionary (for the site) is it now has a website all of its own: www.travelmoneymax.com.

What’s the difference?

Last year we started giving some of our tools their own URL e.g, www.premiumbondcalculator.com and www.megashopbot.com, yet they’re still included within the main MSE frame. Take a look at the TMM and you’ll see that my ugly mugshot isn’t at the top, and nor is the MSE.com logo, it simply has a ‘brought to you by MoneySavingExpert.com’ stamp on it.

Effectively it is an entirely new website focused purely on travel money (though the underlying URL when you click on it is still travelmoney.moneysavingexpert.com).

Why bother?

It’s something I’ve been wanting to do for a while. As the main MSE site and forums have got bigger, it’s easy for users and journalists writing about these issue to forget our tools and they therefore don’t get used as often as they should – especially as most of them are totally unique and unreplicated elsewhere.

The first step was to give each its own identity URL so when they’re written about or people want to link, instead of a long name, they can quickly type in directly what they want.

Now for the major tools we’re going to give each one its own designed identity, so that newbies coming to use the tool don’t wonder why it seems to have a double header. It also helps give each tool a personality of its own, so it’s easier to remember, and hopefully more people will link to it.

Of course the hope is that they will come along and use the rest of the great things the MSE main site and forum have to offer too. Watch this space for more MSE sites, and a few very sexy new tools…

Comment and Discuss

Yo! All you can eat sushi – like a child in a sweetie shop

Last night Mrs MSE and I headed out to use the 40% off Yo! Sushi deal from the restaurant vouchers list. When we got to the restaurant in the Whiteleys Centre in Bayswater, frustratingly it was closed for a private function.

As the voucher’s only valid on Tuesday and Wednesday nights, I asked if it was possible that they could stamp it for a different night, as we were missing out. The girl at the reception gave me a strange look and told me she would go and get the boss.

Thirty seconds later a lady walked round the corner and said, “Hi, my name’s My Ly I’m the marketing manager for Yo! Sushi. It’s great to see you here Martin – we’d love you to come in” (I hadn’t said my name).

By bizarre coincidence we’d stumbled upon the opening party for the refurbishment of that branch, and trial of its new experimental menu. She actually told me that they had thought about inviting me but (correctly) knew that I don’t go to such dos.

As we were there it seemed like a good idea, yet I was slightly concerned about the photographer. The last thing I want to do is be in the marketing brochure so anyone would think there was an implied recommendation. Yet she was happy to have the snapper leave us alone.

Once in I felt like a child in a sweetie shop: I love sushi – it’s my favourite food – so the ability to simply take whatever dish I wanted (and as many as I wanted!) was fantastic. Even though I’m lucky enough to be able to afford to get whatever I want when I am usually there, there’s a freedom when it’s totally free that’s just different.

Better still, Yo! sushi normally does the bill by counting up the number of different coloured plates you’ve had. Yet here they were clearing away the plates so there was no evidence, making it much more comfortable to over-scoff in luxury.

The only downside was that we had planned to play Scrabble over dinner, and as the place was full of cool designers and we were guests that felt a little rude. Still, the new food was good, and My introduced us to the history of the place, as well as chatting about what future vouchers would be coming up (watch this space).

It’ll be interesting to see if they introduce the salmon beetroot maki roll, which tastes a lot better than it sounds, as a regular.

Comment and Discuss.

Oh what a tool I am

Mid-afternoon on Tuesday, as we were all beavering away checking, correcting and writing this week’s money tips email; our designer MSE Darren came up with this fantastic image to go in it.

Tool Of The Week

On first glance it looked great, then we looked again… and changed it (scroll down on the weekly e-mail).

Comment and Discuss.

I almost went to France

Some days are strange….

    • Left home went to London’s Charing Cross Station
    • Got the train to Dover
    • Ferry’d to Calais
    • Stayed on the ferry at Calais
    • Ferry’d to Dover
    • Am currently on the train back to Charing Cross

All this to do a 90-second film for GMTV on mobile roaming, about what counts as being abroad.

France… Je ne le pense pas

Comment and Discuss.

Is this the summer of Love?

The sun is shining, house prices are recovering, and overall sentiment about the economy is improving. On the surface it looks like we’re through the worst of this terrible sustained decline. Admittedly in the real economy people are still losing jobs at a ferocious pace, yet some write that off as a lag indicator; something that drags behind the rest of the economy and therefore isn’t too indicative.

Yet a good chunk of the economists & high end city workers who follow the machinations of wider macro level finance still pull a face and say “ it’s nowhere near over yet, it’s going to get worse.” In fact, at a private meeting I was at recently the mutterings of one globally renowned economist questioned whether we should plan for the potential of the western economies “doing a Japan”: in other words ten years of no growth and deflation.

So is this just a summer of love? Rather than the economy moving in an L-shape (in other words a steep decline then a levelling off) there seems to be a strong suspicion that we are in W (we’ve had a decline we’ve now had a small upturn but it’s going to start going back down again).

Much of the talk hinges on the belief the American economy is in a worse shape than we’ve so far seen, and that it’s been delaying reports coming out in a bid to get its house in order first.

Frankly I have no clue which side to take, and in truth nobody does; predictions are never set in stone. Yet it’s important to be aware that even though sentiment has improved at the moment it’s still worth being sensible and taking some safety precautions, such as spreading your savings (see the safe savings guide) and ensuring you’re as debt-free as possible (see redundancy guide and debt help guides).

Comment and discuss

New consumer advocate … sounds like all puff, no pastry to me

After opening my in-box to a number of e-mails about it, I’ve just read an article in the Guardian about the proposed new consumer advocate the government wants to appoint.

Most were people asking “is it you?”, “are you going to do it?” Well no. It’s the first I’ve heard of it. If there was a consultation, it didn’t come to MSE Towers.

Having read the piece though I understand the questions… here’s few of the Guardian’s salient points:

  • A high-profile national “consumer champion” is to be appointed by the government to help people get their money back when things go wrong and fight for redress over personal finance problems such as unauthorised overdraft charges.
  • Asked whether the advocate would have a high media profile, sitting regularly on the GMTV sofa, for example, consumer affairs minister Kevin Brennan said: “Clearly it should be someone who should have a public face, although I don’t think we want to pre-judge an individual and what kind of skills we would want them to have.” A “competitive” salary is being offered, and the successful applicant is expected to be in the job early next year.
  • Brennan said the appointment would represent a significant step forward for consumer rights: “This is all about helping people to get their money back.

Now, while there are some differences, it pretty much describes the work that the MSE team, our forum, users and I do everyday and have done for many years.

With over 6m bank charges reclaiming letters downloaded, and millions more letters and reclaims on council tax, PPI, mortgage reclaiming, setting off help, this is what MSE is all about.

Does the government think it can appoint an advocate and BINGO, there you go, it’s all done. Or actually is it more likely that, as another branch of officialdom, the aim will simply be to look as if something’s being done.

In the three years of the bank charges campaign NOT ONCE has Gordon Brown or the government made a statement on it. Recently, in my News of the World column, I asked the Prime Minister to look at setting off, and the nightmare it causes – no response.

In the past, the PM has publically told everyone to pay energy by direct debit, yet failed to respond to the bigger issue of massive over billing, which kills the concept for many, and the lack of rights we have (see fight energy direct debits). And I could go on and on about lack of response.

Will a government appointed consumer advocate solve this? Organisations like MSE, Consumer Action Group, Consumer Focus, programmes like Money Box and others have been collectively doing it, both in high profile media and in public policy.

Even Which? has said: ““The jury is out on the creation of the role of consumer advocate, for the devil is in the detail. It will be interesting to see how the role will fit in with the organisations and roles that already exist.”

Frankly, what we really need is some bloody government response on the issues. As you can probably tell, I read this announcement with a huge level of frustration that instead of solving the problems head on, this seems to be a policy focused on looking like something’s being done, rather than actually doing it.

Comment and Discuss.

This website is based on journalistic research. It does not constitute financial advice. Any information should be considered in regard to specific circumstances. All tips are followed at your own risk and should be followed up with your own research . See Full Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. ® Martin Lewis and MoneySavingExpert.com. 'Martin Lewis' and 'Money Saving Expert' are registered trademarks belonging to Martin Lewis.
[Sitemap | Q & As | Contacts | About the Site | Accessibility | Site's Funding]