Martin Lewis
MoneySavingExpert.com Masthead Logo
Bookmark
Digg
Facebook
Twitter

Archive for May, 2009

Can we cope with the base rate rising?

Two months and no base rate cut. Not surprising I suppose as now we’re at 0.5% there’s not exactly anywhere for rates to go. Yet it’s the long term that’s more concerning, as we adapt to this low interest rate, low inflation (or even deflationary) environment, the shock once rates return even just back to where they were a year ago could be a problem…

It won’t be quick

Rates are unlikely to move for the moment.

  • Not much room to drop rates.
  • Economic stimulus still needed so rates aren’t going up.
  • A need for stability.
  • We’ve switched to printing money (or ‘quantitative easing’ to dress it in its official disguise.)
  • There’s a need to wait and see if quantative easing is working.

Add to that the Bank of England’s latest inflation report, which assumes that base rates will still be 0.5% into 2010, and economists have read as a strong signal moves aren’t planned for a while yet.

Of course the only certain thing in the current climate is the uncertainty, and there’s the question of still-high CPI inflation, but on the balance of probability it seems the most likely path.

Can we cope with base rate rises?

So for me the big question right now isn’t ‘will we stay at this current interest rate’, but once we move (in maybe up to a year at a guess), assuming it’s upwards, how quickly will rates rise again?

Let’s suppose inflation’s bubbling at the extreme and we see a mirror image of the 5% cut in just a few months. That’ll leave those sitting on SVR or tracker rate mortgages back to where they were eight months ago.

The mortgage elastic only stretches one way.

There’s a funny thing about price rises after price cuts… the feel-bad factor of the rise is not proportionate to the cut’s feel-good factor. In other words, the rise is much worse than that cut was good.

Suppose someone was paying £1,000 a month on a mortgage and it dropped rapidly to £500, then returned six months later to £1,000. Most people’s psychology will mean that paying £1,000 again feels much more expensive than the first time. This is partly due to what I call “forgotten gold”.

Usually this happens the other way, when people get a pay rise. You were earning £25,000 a year, then it’s £30,000 but very quickly you adapt and stop enjoying the new salary rise as spending increases to take account of the new income and expectations. It’s the reason why if you want to put part of your new salary aside, do it by standing order the very FIRST month the payrise starts… after even a couple of months you’ll find yourself saving less as you don’t want to forgo the benefit.

Much of this is true with the mortgage scenario, tracker holders have adapted to having the extra cash. Those who are simply saving it in a high interest account won’t be hit too hard, but those who are spending it each month will feel the pain.

And that’s the problem, people are bad at cutting back, and over the last ten years far too many have learned to rely on debt to fill the gap (see stop spending guide). Not what you need when rates are jumping.

Comment and Discuss

Who’s Who Recreation Section… what would you put?

For the first time I received a Who’s Who entry form the other day, which is quite cool, and as it’s free I thought… why not.

Then I answered my own question… because filling in the form is more difficult than you might think. What’s my job title, is it just “Money Saving Expert” or do I include the website, journalism & broadcasting? Then the careers section is about “main positions” so what counts as main, do you stuff it with things or keep it sparse? Is it a matter of career reference for everything, or just absolute major jobs.

However all of that’s easy compared to “Recreation”. To help, I peeked at some existing entries, and they varied from simple “Golf, Tennis, Books” type to the “Climbing Kilimanjaro backwards wearing leather pants and singing show tunes” type. Since near the entry form it lists some “unusual recreations”, I wanted to be a bit creative, so I ummed and ahhed and finally came up with:

Recreations: Trying to get my average Scrabble score above 400, Reading historic novels, Very poor golf, Anything with lists, Jive, Watching athletics.”

My favourite bit though was under the “Clubs” section, I just put Manchester City FC.

Try the recreation one yourself… it’s not easy

Comment and Discuss

Steal Pepsi Max: promoting theft of their own product.

I saw the new Pepsi Max TV ad last night , and was slightly bemused. The ‘Pepsi Max guys’ are at a cricket match. In a chiller box the steward has a raft of Pepsi Max cans. A streaker runs on the pitch, the steward chases her, and when he returns the Pepsi Max has gone. Yet our ‘heroes’ are drinking cans of it, and then the punchline… one of their number returns to his seat taking off his girl disguise suit.

Now while it’s meant to be funny, it’s effectively showing the brand heroes stealing the drink. The message is meant to be Pepsi Max is cool and naughty, but it also seems to indicate that nicking it is fine too and just a laugh. What a rather silly premise; I suspect supermarkets and vendors wouldn’t take the same view if people decided to follow Pepsi’s ‘help yourself’ motif from their stores – never mind the company itself.

Am I just having a sense of humour failure…

Comment and Discuss.

Pine nuts: strange taste warning…

This is perhaps the most bizarre blog I’ve ever written. Yet I thought I should warn people about pine nuts. For the last five days I’ve been complaining about a strange after-taste when I eat anything; it’s almost but not quite metallic.

Having had a filling a couple of weeks ago I thought it might be that but nothing seemed wrong. Yet the taste persists and it’s been driving me up the wall.

So I decided to use Google to look up strange tastes and I found the following:

  • Chinese pine nut taste problems.
  • Wikipedia on pine nuts: Risks of eating pine nuts. The eating of pine nuts can cause serious taste disturbances, developing 1-3 days after consumption and lasting for days or weeks. A bitter, metallic taste is described. In general, a minority of pine nuts on the market present this problem. Though very unpleasant, there does not seem to be a real health concern.
  • European Journal of Health. Taste disturbances after pine nut eating.

Now do note I wasn’t looking for pine nuts; you wouldn’t exactly think to would you? Yet the taste disturbance was EXACTLY what I’d described. And no surprise, for the last fortnight I’ve twice had a new salad from a ‘select your own salad ingredients’ place and i’ve asked for pine nuts in it, having never really eaten them before.

While it’s not a scientific diagnosis, and I’m not a medical person, the correlation is pretty strong. Strange taste in mouth – newly started eating pine nuts – Google full of pine nut taste distruptions.

Needless to say… they’re off my menu from now on.

PS. Seems there’s a trend happening here; the day after I wrote this the Mail published this story: Pine Mouth Puzzle

Comment and Discuss

Pulling out of Govt’s Student finance day because of student loan fiasco

As a big supporter of access to education, each year I do an unpaid radio morning in conjunction with the government to explain how student finance works, as there are so many myths and misunderstandings (the parents’ guide to student finance we do each year is part of this).

By bad fate this year’s was scheduled in for tomorrow. Yet last night we heard about the fact the government was going to break the link between student loans and inflation (see student loans: government fails to honour promise); something I think is a dangerous principle and have press released on.

Should I do the day?

This put me in a bind. I think what the government has done is wrong, yet I still passionately believe we need to promote higher education as a viable financial option. Plus it gives me an opportunity to run through my ‘debt isn’t bad, bad debt is bad’ spiel which explains what good and what bad borrowing is: crucial to those just entering the financial world.

However, to do it tomorrow when the student loan issue is so fresh, would mean I’d have no choice but to slag the government off. Doing this when it’s paid for a radio studio (it hires the studio and then you do about 40 local radio interviews) doesn’t seem fair to me.

So I called its communication agency to give them the choice, saying unfortunately either it needed pulling or they needed to be aware what I was going to say. I have an agreement with them anyway that I’m free to say what I want, yet that usually coincides with the message it wants to get out.

In the end we agreed the best route was to pull the day. Of course I’m still going to rant about the student loan issue, but it’s slightly unfair to do it on the government’s own time. I hope we’ll be able to rekindle the day once the student loan funding issue comes down, then while I’ll still mention it, it needn’t be the entire focus.

Comment and Discuss.

Dear Gordon, why no response on Bank Charges?

While checking out how the savers’ rights petition was doing on the number 10 website, I clicked the closed polls section. In there, the tenth biggest ever poll on the site with 70,000 plus signatures is the Bank Charges Consumer Charter.

Scanning the polls above it, every single one of them has (with response) next to it… meaning the government has responded. Not this one though; it sits there naked in solitude. “The biggest poll the Prime Minister has ever ignored!” – not exactly the accolade wanted. Now don’t think this is an issue of scale, there are scores of closed smaller polls which Mr. Brown has decided to respond to.

So why not bank charges? Is it not a big enough issue? Well I doubt that; over 5.8m template letters have been downloaded from this site’s bank charges guide alone, and millions more from elsewhere.

So what is it? Why have politicians singularly failed to address this issue? Regardless of viewpoint, not responding is plain rude – isn’t that what the petition system is set up for?

Let’s hope the savers’ rights petition gets a little bit more attention.

Comment and Discuss.

Apparently my Stiffies was cut!

I’ve been appearing in dictionary corner on Countdown this week. The shows were actually recorded back in March. As you can see from my blog at the time, Doing Countdown and getting a rude word to boot, I had a fun time.

It was yesterday’s (Wed) episode that was supposed to contain the rude word, and while I haven’t seen it myself I’ve been told it wasn’t broadcast.

So I can now reveal (if you didn’t guess from the blog title) the word was “stiffies”. Now there’s no doubt it’s a word, and is in the dictionary; the problem is there’s only one definition, which isn’t that easy for mid-afternoon telly. Luckily for Countdown, as it was from dictionary corner not the contestants, it’s possible to edit it out without impacting the result of the game.

As it wasn’t broadcast I can tell you the full story now. Once we realised what the word was, as the clock was ticking down, I wrestled with whether to say it or not and tried to come up with a way round it saying something like (from memory from two months ago so give or take):

“Well we do indeed have an eight letter word here. Now it’s an interesting one for this time in the afternoon, and so to make it easier I thought I would explain how to think about it.

When you walk past a shop they often have mannequins in the window. Some of these are flexible and can be positioned any way you want, while others are rigid and unmoving. So if you had a collection of these you could call them “stiffies”.

Comment and Discuss.

Fawlty Towers: Uncle Terry wants a Gin & Tonic

Quite a strange experience tonight. Watching Fawlty towers and up pops the MSFs Uncle Terry (Terence Conoley). I always knew he’d been in it but until tonight had never seen him.

He’s actually in two episodes. The first was the very first Fawlty Towers “A Touch Of Class” where he constantly demands with ever increasing fury a “Gin & Orange, a lemon squash and a scotch and water”.

What was rather surreal is the fact that having seen it before I knew exactly who the character was, but until watching it now it’d never clicked that’s who Terry was. After seeing it I realised how many other things I’d seen him in. Terry is now nearly 90, and full of wonderful stories, with a fantastic cut glass accent and manner (he’s an ex-opera singer too).

Having seen the first it was a quick fast forward to the the next one he was in – the “Waldorf Salad” episode. Again he’s playing an irate “Mr. Johnson”, this time in a wig, which apparently he went shopping with John Cleese for, to ensure he wasn’t recognised as the same actor from the first series.

Go “Uncle” Terry!

Comment and Discuss.

How credit ratings work: coming full circle.

I’m just finishing work on an ITV1 Tonight for Friday 8 May on credit ratings on how they work and how to boost them. As always when filming a detailed programme like this I learn new useful titbits which I can add to the guide (see credit ratings).

Each time though, it tends to be something even more niche and technical, this time it was that you can delink your credit score if you’ve a still open but not active joint account, plus for the first time looked into fraud scoring with National Hunter (the guide should be updated with that by tomorrow).

What was funny about this though is my first EVER TV package was on credit ratings and how they work. It was back in January 2000, I’d just left the BBC and was starting at Simply Money TV as a reporter. The channel hadn’t launched yet and we were doing films for pre-launch; so I did a six-minute film on how credit ratings work.

It was back then I remember coining the phraseology I still use now: “Credit ratings don’t exist. Credit Blacklists don’t exist. Each lender has its own unique scoring system to work out if you’re a profitable customer.” Thankfully no editions exist on You Tube; it was a long time ago and I was a rather shy first time 27 year old new reporter (I’d been a producer previously).

I’ve since written and done a lot on credit ratings, and each time the knowledge base grows. This particular programme was fun to do as we had a panel with James, who runs education for Experian, and mortgage broker Ray Boulger of John Charcol. I think by the end of it we’d all learned little titbits off each other and hopefully the programme’s better for it.

Comment and Discuss.

This website is based on journalistic research. It does not constitute financial advice. Any information should be considered in regard to specific circumstances. All tips are followed at your own risk and should be followed up with your own research . See Full Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. ® Martin Lewis and MoneySavingExpert.com. 'Martin Lewis' and 'Money Saving Expert' are registered trademarks belonging to Martin Lewis.
[Sitemap | Q & As | Contacts | About the Site | Accessibility | Site's Funding]