Martin Lewis

Martin’s Blog…

Hi, welcome to my Blog, while the site’s articles have all the key MoneySaving info; this is my space to muse on a wider collection of topics; life, money, being in the media and more. Feel free to read or ignore!


Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert.

Archive for May, 2008

Door-to-door sales… can we ask them to be more responsible?


Tuesday May 13th, 2008

My wonderful grandma, who’s about to celebrate her 86th birthday (and will be furious if she finds out I’ve put that in here!) recently had some door-to-door sales people knock at the door asking her to switch her home phone to TalkTalk. Now, as you’ll be unsurprised to hear, my Uncle and I have ensured she’s already on the correct tariff (BT with an override and she doesn’t need broadband) and she told them “my son deals with this and he’s not home.”

They persuaded her to get her bills out for them to look at, even though she’d repeatedly said she didn’t deal with it – they were so persistent she felt she had to. Afterwards, she was upset about whether she’d done the right thing, even though fortunately she hadn’t signed anything, and this upset continued for a day or two.

Grandma comes from a different generation; when she’s been sent a letter from a utility company/insurance firm saying “get our policy and we’ll save you money” I still get calls from her asking me should she switch, even though she knows what I do, and knows we’ve ensured she’s on the best of everything. Often these are offers for abysmal products, but she considers if they say “you’ll save” then they can’t be lying. After all, “how did they get my address?”

So when we asked “why didn’t you just say, I’m sorry, I’m not interested thank you” and close the door, Grandma replied that she thought this impolite as they were trying to help her.

The wider point

I’m a great believer in the adversarial relationship between companies and consumers. A company’s job is to make money, and our job is to keep our cash and make it stretch further. Thus, while many rail on about ‘responsible lending’ my key message is about ‘responsible borrowing.’ For me then, in general I would say if a door-to-door salesperson tries to sell you something, you have to take responsibility and decide whether you’re going to be sold to.

Yet how do we square that with people who aren’t playing in the same sphere? Especially some of the older generation who operate by different rules, or following on from my last blog, those with mental capacity or health issues. Ethically I believe these salespeople should’ve seen my grandma, an older lady, and realised it was inappropriate to continue especially when being told she didn’t deal with it. Yet of course, they’re commission led and focused on that – without understanding that this type of thing can leave some people upset, or even in a panic.

How do we square that circle?

Comment and Discuss


Mental Health and Debt: True Bravery


Monday May 12th, 2008

This morning I went to help launch the mental health charity Mind’s Mindweek which this year is tackling the problem of debt. It’s a subject I’m passionate about; mental health affects one in four people in the UK, and a quarter of them have severe debt problems, compared to 1 in 11 of the population in general. Yet it’s rarely spoken of.

In a few weeks, we’re funding and launching a a major new MoneySavingExpert.com guide to dealing with debt with Mind when you’ve got mental health issues, including info for carers, see my blog (Mental Health and Debt; new guide to come). It’s being written jointly by me and the MSE team, as well as some senior mental health psychiatrists.

Showing some real developments

One of the delights of this is that the FSA is funding mental health case workers to be trained in debt issues. This is hugely important; many do it informally anyway (as you’ll see from my foreward note below), so to hear it being done formally is hugely important.

True bravery

Due to doing a photocall to help promote the week (rather sadly, the week itself doesn’t cut it with the media, having someone there off the telly helps get them there) I arrived at the speeches late. I was sat next to Liz on the top table; at first I assumed she was the delegate from the regulator the FSA; a smartly dressed, well spoken woman. As I had to rush off, I was first to speak … so I got up and did my bit. I was planning to head off then, but Liz started to speak.

She said, “I’m speaking to you after years of serious depression and terrible debt, with people knocking at my door”. I sat, listened and felt quite humbled by her story, but also by the fact she was there telling it, self-evidentally petrified, but strongly determined to carry on.

For most people, public speaking is difficult enough; yet for Liz to be there, not just speaking, but telling such a personal tale, of how she even now can’t afford to pay most of the bills, the terrible harassment and difficulties she faced from debt collectors when suffering clinical post-natal depression, and the horrid impact of them, was inspiring and truly brave. At one point she stopped, saying she was too nervous to carry on, but a near spontaneous round of applause warmed her back in.

I stayed until she’d finished. And it’s renewed the vigour in which I intend to try and engage with this issue.

Comment and Discuss

Also below I have copied my Foreword from the Mind week brochure, which helps explain why I’m so passionate about it.

Foreword

Severe debt isn’t just a financial problem. It causes relationships to break up, people to lose their homes and families to break down. No matter who you are, it can send you to the pits of despair.

Yet for many who already live with mental distress, debt is a common problem. My usual rant is to rally against the ethos of responsible lending, in order to focus on responsible borrowing.

After all, the idea of putting those whose business is making money from lending in charge of when and how we can borrow is ridiculous.

Yet a few years ago I had my eyes opened. A man came up to me to thank me for my website. I asked him if he’d saved much money and his answer surprised me:

“I don’t use it for myself. I’m a mental health case worker; almost every one of my clients has debt issues. It’s tough for them to control many areas of their life. I use your site to help them sort through their problems.”

That was in the earlier part of my career. Since then, that story’s been echoed with an ever-increasing volume many times since. Yet while the noise grows, the coverage doesn’t. On a number of occasions, I’ve pitched to TV outlets, to be told the story doesn’t resonate to enough people.

Rubbish. The correlation between those in debt and those with mental health issues is far too strong. Most people have either had issues themselves or have a family member who has. This is a growing blight on our society and one we have to tackle.

For some people with mental health problems, there are times when being responsible for yourself simply isn’t possible. When that happens our nation’s ease of credit is a potential disaster scenario.

Yet this must be tempered by the fact that we can’t disenfranchise people from the credit market. Debt isn’t bad – bad debt is bad. A rational decision to borrow and do it cheaply is fine; mortgages, car loans and other investment-based borrowing is a part of our modern financial world.

These questions aren’t easy ones, and too few people want to focus on them. That’s why I’m delighted to be involved with and support the Mind week 2008 campaign.

Martin Lewis

Money Saving Expert


Why BOGOFs stop me buying tangerines…


Tuesday May 6th, 2008

For the second time recently I’ve not bought tangerines because they were a BOGOF offer. This may seem strange; after all, BOGOF means two for the price of one, so as a Money Saving Expert I should go for that…

Yet the MSF doesn’t eat tangerines, so they’re just for me. I can manage one pack before they go off, but I can’t manage two. Thus I’m left with the following choices…

    A. Get both bags and throw one away. This surely can’t be right, its wasteful and environmentally damaging. Of course I could give one away, but that’s an added hassle, and I’m not sure who’d take them from me anyway.

    B. Get one bag. Yet then, psychologically this feels wrong. I can’t have something on BOGOF but not take the second one. This feels like I’m paying twice as much as I should do for them.

Of course, when loose tangerines are available, that’s the easy solution, even though peel for peel it’s more expensive than the BOGOF. Yet I think the supermarkets, for once, are a little behind on the psychology on this one… doing BOGOFs on short life span foods has some problems; after all if BOGOFs stop me buying, that can’t be right.

Have you ever done this?

Comment and Discuss

PS. If you’re struggling with food prices, take a look at the Cheap Supermarket Shopping guide.


Some mortgage brokers don’t know who their friends are…


Friday May 2nd, 2008

Recently I’ve had a couple of nasty emails from mortgage brokers. Now I’m used to insulting comments from some businesses, mainly because showing people how to save money means that businesses lose out, often due to haggling.

Yet with mortgage brokers I tend to be in favour, and have strongly recommended them for many years. I have had many nice e-mails too. That’s why emails, such as this one sent to the site, are a little unfair, and out of order.

“Dear sir/Madam,

That’s it, I and my colleagues have simply had enough of Mr Lewis’s open abuse of Mortgage Brokers. I find it unacceptable and unprofessional to offer our services to the public as a “quick way to get free advice and an overview of the market”.

Why I would give my services for free I’m not sure, but will cretainly expect to see his fees for any recent interviews donated to charity.

What a hypoctritical zealot Mr Lewis is.

Your’s hoping he falls off something high up. ”

I’ve withheld his name. Normally I ignore them, yet this was a step too far, so I thought it would be useful to send a response and publish the dialogue.

My response:

“Thank you for your email. I shall ignore the nasty and unpleasant tone and respond to your substantive point. Though, I must say, if all mortgage brokers took your tone, I certainly wouldn’t feel comfortable suggesting anyone went to see them…

I am a huge supporter of mortgage brokers.

For the last seven years, my main statement on how to get a mortgage has been simple: “don’t go to a bank or building society, but use a mortgage broker”. I’ve done this in print, on TV, on radio, on the web, in magazines and in my books. This is a constant mantra. How on earth you equate this to your accusation of “open abuse of Mortgage Brokers” I have no idea!

Large numbers of people use mortgage brokers due to this site/my media appearances.

I genuinely believe I’ve had a positive impact on the number of people using mortgage brokers for advice. I constantly meet people and they say “I got my deal through a mortgage broker as you recommend” – someone said that to me on a radio programme the other day. In fact, even your trade magazine, Mortgage Strategy, had a piece commenting on the fact I was doing this only the other week.

I make no apology for being specific about the type of advisor.

I of course do push people towards ‘whole of market’ brokers, I believe that is the appropriate thing to do and the minimum standard of quality required.

I prefer fees free brokers.

I also favour fees free, as there are many good fees free brokers out there who are whole of market. This seems to be the crux of your problem. Yet the rules are quite simple for me: if good advice exists without paying for it, then why pay?

I certainly don’t ask you, as you suggest, to “give your services for free”. As we are both aware, fees free brokers make money from the proc fee. And I don’t suggest you need to become a fee free broker, but this is MONEY SAVING EXPERT. The title’s self explanatory, and that’s why people come here.

Funnily enough, recently I’ve actually made it plain that if you like your advisor and they charge a fee, then its fine. Though of course finding a fees free one you like would be even cheaper.

Of course I tell people to compare the non-broker lenders.

Currently HSBC’s rate matcher deal is market leading for some people. My suggestion, as I believe wholly appropriate, is to compare the best of its deal versus the best your broker offers you and go with the cheapest. I cannot see anything inappropriate about this. This is the best info and that’s what I aim for. In fact, recently, I’ve some emails from brokers telling me that they’re starting to suffer with so many direct to market deals – that giving good advice is difficult.

Even so, I think for most people the broker route is a positive experience, though widening to others deals is a very good belt and braces idea.

I hope I have addressed your points in this email. You are not the first to raise the point, but you’re certainly the most abusive. I will be publishing your e-mail and my response on my site as I think it’s appropriate people see the rent-seeking behaviour that is going on.

I genuinely believe I am a strong supporter of the mortgage broker industry; way and above any other advisers, including IFAs. To get abuse like this is unwarranted. My remit is simple: to try and save people money. I wholeheartedly believe this is the best way to do it.

As a by-product, I believe the mortgage broker industry gains. Yet you can’t pick and choose; you can’t have it that I simply say ‘use a mortgage broker’, without qualifying the way I believe it is best to do so.
Regards

Martin Lewis
MoneySavingExpert.com

Comment and Discuss


Rude words in my new Scrabble dictionary


Friday May 2nd, 2008

I’m excited. Our new Scrabble dictionary arrived today. As regulars will know, the MSF and I play a lot of Scrabble (see my previous blogs ‘I scored 596 at Scrabble, so why does it depress me?’, ‘SUPER SCRABBLE! WOW!’ and ‘I admit it. I’m addicted. It’s a US website and it’s not healthy!’).

We have the family Scrabble dictionary but now have ordered the BIG “Official Scrabble Dictionary” – with every allowable scrabble word.

The problem with the family dictionary is it’s sanitised; not much use if your letters are FITWUCK. Plus there are a few words that aren’t in the family one such as Viner (a vine dresser).

I did rather enjoy finding out that Marting is “to sell or trade something”.

Now the fun bit…

It’s very difficult not to immediately look up rude words, and so I didn’t fight very hard.
First, a combination of words that start with a well known four letter swear word beginning with an F! For propriety’s sake I shall replace it with the word blob… and include it’s definitions.

• Blob… Taboo word meaning to have sexual intercourse with
• Blobbed… refer to Blob
• Blobber… Taboo word for a despicable or obnoxious person
• Blobbers… refer to Blobber
• Blobbing… refer to Blob
• Blobbings… refer to Blob
• Bloboff… Taboo word an annoying or unpleasant person (ML NOTE: obviously this means “Bloboff” is different to “Blob off” which I would define as a taboo word to tell someone to go away)
• Blobs… refer to Blob
• Blobup… (verb) Taboo word meaning to damage or bungle
• Blobup… (noun) Taboo word meaning an act or instance of bungling
• Blobups… refer to Blobup
• Blobwit… taboo word for a fool or idiot
• Blobwits… refer to Blobwit

My favourite definition…

And this one is priceless… I’ve never heard of it, but the Scrabble dictionary is a ball of fun.

This involves another swear word, this one the famous W one, often used in the six letter form with an “er” at the end. Here I shall replace it with the word Plop… it’s the definition that’s the best bit.

• A Plopsta… a derogatory slang word for a person who acts or dresses like a gangster but is not involved in crime…

Now how many points is that?

Comment and Discuss
(In the forum discussion, please refrain from using swear words)


This website is based on journalistic research. It does not constitute financial advice. Any information should be considered in regard to specific circumstances. All tips are followed at your own risk and should be followed up with your own research . See Full Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy (last updated 19.12.06). © Martin Lewis and Martin S Lewis Ltd